How Elasticity Affects the Pricing of Coffee in Mount
Holyoke College
by An, Maame, Mariah, and Meher
Caffeine to get started in the morning, a bit more
mid-morning to make it through that class before lunch, another cup for that
mid-afternoon class during which food comas kick in, yet some more when the
realization sets in that it is going to be a late night due to work. When
walking around any university or college campus, coffee is the staple that can
be seen in many students hand at pretty much any time of day. Easily half if
not more of the student population at Mount Holyoke College are coffee
drinkers. Many of them are addicted to the caffeine and have it at least once a
day if not more often. However, coffee is an expensive habit to keep up while
in college. Whether students own their own brewer, or buy cups of it from the
cafes around campus, or go into South Hadley and surrounding towns to grab a
cup from local and chain coffee shops, the costs of all those cups throughout
the semester really accumulate. So why do students keep drinking so much
coffee?
Price elasticity is defined to be “the percent change in
quantity divided by the percent change in price.” It is the responsiveness of
customers’ demand to the change in price, in this case, specifically, students’
choice of buying coffee when its price changes. Inelasticity is the case when
the percentage change in quantity is less than the change in price. To many
students in Mt. Holyoke College, their demand for coffee is inelastic, that
means if the price of coffee rises, students will still choose to buy coffee.
Then why is the demand for coffee of Mt. Holyoke students inelastic? Let’s take
into account three groups of students. Students from the first groups take 5
academic classes this semester, not to mention a physical education class.
Therefore they usually drop by Rao’s to buy a cup of coffee before
staying up until 2pm in the library writing essays, doing homework or finishing
lab assignments. The second groups of students are very energetic. They
participate in varsity teams such as crew team, swimming team, etc. They
usually have to get up at 5 or 6 in the morning everyday to drill. Right after
that, they may just purchase some coffee from Uncommon Ground on their way to
classes to keep them awake for the whole day. For the third group, they are
coffee lovers; thus, they usually take a to-go cup of coffee from the dining
hall every time they go for their meals. For such a great demand of coffee
around campus, even if the price rises, students are willing to pay higher for
a cup of coffee when they need, which leads to inelasticity.
Now within this small consumer base, there are options from
where to purchase coffee, namely Uncommon Grounds, Raos and Thirsty Mind (the
caveat being that dining hall coffee doesn’t really count since it is often
lukewarm and weak). For someone who really doesn’t have a preference between
these places but often chooses Raos before heading to the library, sees the
coffees as perfect substitutes. This will mean that if Rao’s decides to
increase the price of their coffee by even 50 cents, all the students who
consider Uncommon Grounds or Thirsty Mind as equally good, will shift to
consuming coffee from those places instead. This means that the PED of Rao’s
coffee for those people is infinite.
Another way to look at this is through the Cross Elasticity model.
If the price of Raos coffee goes up, the quantity demanded of Uncommon Grounds
coffee will increase as well. This will be reflected by a CED value > 0. On
the other hand, if the price of luna bars available at Rao’s (an energy bar
many students enjoy alongside a coffee), decreases, many students may feel
compelled to get a coffee from Raos to go with their Luna bar. These two
substitute and complement relationships are shown in the CED graph below:
Therefore, we can conclude that price elasticity of demand, as
well as the Cross price elasticity of demand is what all firms producing coffee
at this college would find useful to consider.
No comments:
Post a Comment