Work or Leisure – Comparative
Statics of Labor Supply
Xianger, Shelley, Lady, and Delia
We’ve already talked about opportunity cost and consumer’s
decision. The opportunity cost of leisure is the wage rate, which means people
need to decide how they want to distribute their time between work and leisure.
We’re going to talk about the tradeoff between labor and leisure that lies
behind the graph.
The following assumption is based on the situation of a
Mount Holyoke student named Anna. Anna receives a generous financial aid
package from the college. She starts her first year in college with an
endowment. However, as a requirement for work-study, she has to work in Dining
Services her first year. The wage of this Level 1 job is $8 per hour. The money
she earns comes from her work-study package, so she can spend the money as she
wishes. She has the possibility of working 10 hours/week to earn $80 weekly.
During her first year, Anna has to work but she can also afford some leisure
time.
When Anna becomes a sophomore at Mount Holyoke College, she
receives the same financial aid package as in her first year. She applies and
gets a job as a Career Center Peer Advisor, which pays $8.70 an hour. Anna is
faced with two choices. She could work the same amount of hours as she did in
her first year as a Dining Services worker. Working the same amount of hours,
she would still earn more because the wage at her new job is higher. On the
other hand, she could choose to work more hours because the wage has gone up.
Anna decides to work more hours than she did last year precisely because
her wage has increased. Her wage has increased but not to the point where she
wants to work less. The substitution effect is stronger because labor goes up
and the opportunity cost of leisure increases. At this point, leisure becomes
more expensive than labor, so she wants to consume less leisure in order to
make more money.
Anna starts her junior year at Mount Holyoke with the same
financial aid package and an internship at a law firm in the town of Amherst.
Her wage at the law firm is $20 an hour. She also stops working as a Career
Center Peer Advisor. Anna has the choice to work more at the internship to earn
a higher income or she could choose to work a decent amount since now she has
additional income for all the hours she is working. By acquiring a job with an
increased wage, the return from working additional hours and the opportunity
cost of leisure both increase. If the substitution effect is stronger, Anna
would want to increase her consumption since leisure will become more expensive
(wages lost as the price of leisure). The higher wage at the internship gives
her large incentive to work more hours. However, Anna does not need a large
amount of money to live as a college student at Mount Holyoke. She is limited
because she cannot choose to be a
full time worker since this will come at the expense of her being a full time
student. Additionally, choosing to work more hours will take time away from her
schoolwork and social activities since she has to factor in transportation
costs. It takes 50 minutes to get to her internship and back with the PVTA that
takes her from Mount Holyoke College to the town of Amherst. She decides to
work less hours a week at the internship than the amount she worked at her
career center job on campus. Since the internship affords her more time while
working less hours, the income effect starts to outweigh the substitution
effect. Since Anna is now receiving a substantially higher wage, she is going
to choose to use her income to purchase additional leisure time. The
substantial increase in her wage reduces the supply of labor.
In conclusion, Anna begins her college education with an endowment due to her financial aid package. As the total wage she receives from either on-campus or off-campus job increases, her decision changes from work more in order to get more consumption to work less in order to enjoy more leisure. Her supply curve of labor bends backward as the wage goes up.
No comments:
Post a Comment